Lost Scriptures: Books That Didn’t Make it into the New
Testament – Bart D. Ehrman – 2 Stars
Title: Lost
Scriptures: Books That Didn’t Make it into the New Testament
Author: Bart
D. Ehrman
Publisher: Oxford
University Press
Year: 2005
Softcover
Rating: 2 Stars

Review: I
actually liked this books despite the 2 Star review!
I am giving it a two star review for the LDS Community,
as for the most part there is not reason the LDS Community needs to read
it. There is little value for the masses
in it. However, for those who are interested
in early Christian beliefs from the Gnostic and other splinter groups from Christianity
this is interesting. I will quantify
that statement a little. I don’t mean
the early Church – I mean the early Christians (first 1,000 years) – there is a
difference.
The book included a translation of about 25 books or
writing that didn’t make it into the New Testament that claim from one source
or another to be attributed to New Testament characters: Letters of Clement,
Gospel of the Savior, Second (Secret) Gospel of Mark, Acts of Peter, Gospel of
Thomas, etc.
There is also very good reason why these texts were not
included in the New Testament. For the
most part it is clear that they are not written by the apostolic authors, but
were attributed to them at a much later date in order to give their writing
credibility, and also the thoughts and theories credibility as well.
Most of these writings were written well after (maybe
centuries after) their attribution, and among the various different splinter
sects of Christianity, mostly Gnostic, and they were written to sanction a believe,
theory, or general practice. Many of
these writings also contradict the general teachings put forth in the New
Testament.
When the New Testament was compiled some of these writings
were proposed, some of them not known, and some might not have even been
written yet. But there was good reason
why they were not included.
For the purpose of the LDS Community, it can be
intriguing because of our widely held understandings of the censorship within
the Bible, and the reality that there are more sacred works out there. But for the purpose of this collection, this
is not the place to find them – the book really yields no faithful additions to
the active LDS member. However, for
those of us who are interested in general knowledge of these beliefs it is a
great reference. I love source material,
and so when reading other books about the Gnostic belief system it is great to
have a reasonable translation of some of their sources. For that reason I appreciate the book, and so
would most hard core Bible Students – but outside of that it is skippable.
There were maybe a handful of interesting tidbits that
came out of it that I found interesting, but maybe five quotable moments out of
the whole text (Secret Gospel of Mark, and the experience of Peter’s vision of
the resurrected cross).
I will also add, I am not giving it a low rating because
I am concerned that there is anything here that would threaten your faith
either. The book is pretty straight
forward, and the writings are clear, as well as clearly not relevant. For the most part if you are not a die hard
fan of boring source material I would be surprised that anyone would finish
it. You are not going to rock your faith
reading this – it just isn’t going to be worth your time one way or the other.
Suggestions: No need to worry about the book, as
sensational and intriguing as it sounds.
It doesn’t really add anything to your faith, or belief system.
I hope you have enjoyed this review, and I encourage you
to follow this blog as I update more reviews in the coming days, weeks, months,
etc. Please feel free to also follow my
YouTube page – however, I enjoy writing more than being on camera!
Review #45
Tags: 2 Stars,
History, Lost Scriptures, Scripture Commentary, New Testament Commentary, Bart D. Ehrman, LDS Book Review, Ryan Daley
No comments:
Post a Comment