Book of the Law of the Lord – James J. Strang – 1 Star
Title: The
Book of the Law of the Lord
Author: James
J. Strang
Publisher: Self-Published/Reprint/Online
Year: Original
1856 – Reprint 1948 - Online
Rating: 1 Star
If you are like me and need the book for the shelf you
will find some difficulties. It was
originally printed in 1856, and wasn’t reprinted again until the second edition
in 1948 which was a reprint of the 1856 edition. Since then for the most part it hasn’t been
printed again. This is probably due to
the lack of influence and popularity the book carries with it. There is more detail below. If you are curious just read it online. A first edition will run you $3-5k, and you
wouldn’t want to read it; and a second edition retails from $300-500.
Review: This
was one of the biggest disappointments I have ever read! My initial recommendation is to just ignore that
this book even exists.
Let me give you some background first, then I will go
into details of my expectations, and then what actually happened.
For a little bit of background: After the death of Joseph Smith there were a
number of people claiming succession rights to the “kingdom of God” and a
gentleman by the name James Jesse Strang was one of them. He claimed to have a letter with the
signature of Smith stating he was to take over (that document is another
discussion). Shortly after that, various
sects (not moving west) started to form and one of them followed Strang – which
he eventually moved to Voree, Wisconsin and eventually to an island called
Beaver Island.
A little known fact about this period of time is that the
publication of the Book of Mormon was in short supply, and many of the break-off
sects were struggling to survive as a result of scripture drought. Around this time, Strang claimed to have been
given the plates of brass and translated the original “Law of the Lord” that
was contained in them from Moses. Yes,
these were the same plates of brass that Nephi acquired – which would have had
the Law of the Lord on them (supposedly).
He published that translation as The Book of the Law of the Lord (first
in a pamphlet in 1851, then as a book in 1856), and successfully tried to
justify his own prophetic mantle, and resolve the scripture drought in one
step.
(For another conversation, the Book of Mormon wasn’t able
to be published in the US for copyright reasons – which is the reason why the
Utah branch of Mormonism printed all of their copies in Liverpool England until
1871; using the copyright Young acquired when he printed the Book of Mormon in
1841 in England under the direction of Smith.
The 1841 Edition of the Book of Mormon is arguable the second most
important edition ever printed – as it gave Young the right to continue to
print it after the death of Smith.)
As a fan of church history (all of it), I have always
been somewhat interested in these sects that broke off. Also as a fan of world religion, I also
generally have a positive attitude towards those who seek to help others gain a
better perspective of eternity. For the
most part, regardless of the full degree of truth they carry with them, I tend
to believe they are coming from a good place with good intentions. With that in mind, I was excited to get a
second edition copy of the Book of the Law of the Lord and give it a read.
Here are my impressions.
With all due respect, and a part of me hates to be so brutal
to a sacred work of scripture for a denomination, but from an LDS perspective
the book is a fraud. For something that
supposedly would supersede the Book of Mormon, it carries with it nothing of
interest, nothing of spirituality, and nothing but reiterating the basic laws
in the OT. There are moments where you
read and clearly see the philosophy and thought process of man – but never do
you hear, see, or feel divinity in the process.
It literally feels like a step back into a lesser law.
Through the short “translation” most of the pages are
filled with inserted commentary to justify the translation. Strang seeks to defend himself and his
thoughts even before anyone questions it.
Where Smith would unapologetically translate, reveal, and than walk away
from divine criticism – Strang seems to lean into to expecting the
challenge. There is commentary in there
that makes you think he is trying to convince himself with grand thoughts and
interpretations of his own translation.
For those who are used to something greater in their
scriptures of the restoration – there is so much to be desired here – and a
complete absence of the spirit. From
there it is too easy to conclude that Strang was not only a fraud, but
desperately trying to lead people astray for his own purposes (whatever those
may be).
This was an extremely disappointing read. Please don’t read this text –not even if you
are interested, it will be a complete waste of time. Don’t get me wrong – I don’t think it will “trick
you” into apostasy. If you read it, you
will clearly walk away with no temptation – it just will be a huge waste of
time.
After reading this book you begin to get perspective as
to why the movement struggles to survive even today – albeit one of only three
remaining sects of Smith’s Mormonism today.
Suggestions: Skip it – without giving it a second
thought. If you are considering it, jump
on the strangite.org website and start reading it yourself, and in a few short
minutes you will lose interest.
I hope you have enjoyed this review, and I encourage you
to follow this blog as I update more reviews in the coming days, weeks, months,
etc. Please feel free to also follow my
YouTube page – however, I enjoy writing more than being on camera!
Review #40
Tags: 1 Stars,
Church History, Sacred Scripture, James J. Strang, Book of the Law of the Lord,
LDS Book Review, Ryan Daley
You've stolen my copyrighted photographs for this bigoted review. Take one or the other down.
ReplyDelete. By the time I looked out of the window it was already light outside. A look at the clock revealed at was already 6 am and there were 2 or 3 chapters left. I finished that book that very morning. As it promised, it changed my life forever. I am Affirmation
ReplyDelete